Contranym
Oversight is an interesting contranym! Too many incidents of oversight prove absence of oversight!
Contranym?
A contranym is a word with the same spelling but the opposite meaning. In other words, it’s a homonym that’s an antonym. A homonym is a word spelled like another with a different meaning while an antonym is a word with the opposite meaning, context in which it is used deciding the meaning.
Oversight, in the context of ‘overseeing’, is about supervision but in its contranym context, it’s about errors unintentional or otherwise. Frequent incidents of oversight indicate systemic rot in the system due to ineffective oversight; disastrous and fatal for organisations.
I can't help but narrate such a story I witnessed being scripted!
Sun Like Nowhere Else
The story unfolds in the most unbelievably beautiful settings of the backwaters in God’s Own country. To believe, one has to experience the morning sun, reflecting itself in grandeur over the still waters of the Punnamada, an extension of Vembanad Lake. It is refreshing to the soul, like nowhere else. As the dusk cloaks the lake, flares of the refinery in the far distance, a stark reminder of the pollutants we spew, gives another side of life.
The Front Office
I arrived at the front office of the reputed resort after prior intimation and having provided the required documents online. I reached as per the schedule intimated. However, the front office was vacant. I had to look for the executives. Little while, not one but three of them emerged from the room behind.
Once they arrived, they asked me for my documents. I replied that I had already forwarded those except photo ids which I had refused to give online. While the executives busied themselves rummaging through a pile of documents, I went off to park my car as valet parking facilities had been discontinued due to covid. It took me a while to find space and park. Though I was the only guest to check in at that time, it still took them time to successfully ‘excavate’ my documents and complete the formalities of check-in. Clearly all that pre-check in calls and intimation of arrival time for fast smooth check-in remained on paper.
Their inefficiency, cost us the customary reception and our welcome drink.
Was it an oversight; an inadvertent error
of a few youngsters enjoying themselves at the cost of work or deeper malaise, deteriorating
work ethics; lack of oversight?
The Restaurant
The most important element of any vacation, after 'location', is dining experience. Thus, one of the key departments of any resort is the food and beverage Department, visible to all as the resort restaurant.
A good restaurant stands out from others with its range of spread, quality of food, hygiene, ambiance and the quality of service. Each good restaurant develops a consistent signature quality. Over time, this signature becomes its USP.
Punctuality is a key element of service. When the board outside clearly indicates that the restaurant will be open from 7:30 AM for breakfast, it requires the first batch of the mandated spread laid out and the staff to be at station, ready to receive the first guest latest by 7:30 AM. The room should have been aired well, lights and fans or air conditioners functional. Tables should have been laid with clean tablemats, cutlery and crockery and stewards of the morning shift at stations with welcome smiles.
Incomplete spread even at 8:15 AM and staff trickling in well
after 8 o'clock, as a matter of practice, for breakfast engagement at 7:30 AM and
no one to question is clear indication of deep-rooted rot. An order from the
live kitchen counter when served dead cold and flies perched fearlessly on the
platters say a lot about the management. Coffee in burnt milk clearly shows the
quality controls in place. The extent to which the rot had already been
internalised became evident when concerned individuals did nothing about the issues
flagged.
No attempt to correct it and not even an apology! Surely
these just couldn’t be random instances of oversight. The rot was real.
An Oasis
It is not that everything was bad. There were oases in the desert of insensitive incompetence.
The ‘activity department’ seemed to be purpose driven. They made sure anyone who came around was engaged.
Housekeeping did justice to the brand image. The efficiency with which issues brought to their notice was attended to is commendable. Once the issue was settled, feedback from the guest was taken by those higher in the chain of housekeeping. It clearly showed that the organisational system caters for oversight and redressal mechanisms. Some seemed to hold it dear, while others had no fear.
Oversight Mechanisms
All organisations create oversight mechanisms to promote functional efficiency and organisational growth. Oversight structures are subsumed in organisational hierarchy and come with clear enunciations of authority, responsibility and accountability. When effective, it reduces the probability of instances of oversight, builds better controls and improves productivity.
Process of oversight normally involves
continuous evaluation and periodic reviews of performances against standards
expected and well-defined parameters, by and through channels of reporting. It includes
aspects of organisational feedbacks that finally result in differential growth
amongst employees. Customer feedback, especially in hospitality and service
organisations, is one tool that oversight mechanism heavily relies upon, but
often distorted.
Eliciting Feedback
It has become a practice to elicit favourable feedbacks at the time of check out. The process is so well ‘crafted’ that the guest checking out is ‘subtly managed’ into giving ratings better than what he or she would have given, if left free. This practice has become rampant amongst almost all service providers.
This actually is the “most unkindest” cut
that can be inflicted by employees on the organisation. It actually destroys from
its very roots, any meaningful feedback from patrons. A managed feedback not
only hides systemic flaws, it reinforces failure and accelerates
disintegration. Unfortunately, when quality is blindly quantified and wilfully
distorted at source, the soul of true feedback is dead; buried alive.
Modern Don Quixote
Leader of an organisation who insulates himself or herself from flaws and problems, relying on manufactured feedback is like the foolish captain of a ship, happy seeing the bow rise, ignorant of the stern taking in water. Elicited feedbacks can bloat egos, but do little to stem the rot. Leaders, who create and perpetuate such an organisational culture and thrive on such make-believe spectacles are modern-day Don Quixotes busy transforming their organisation into ‘Rocinante’ the half-starved horse.
As incompetence becomes the
norm, discontent ripples over and organisations disintegrate. Don
Quixotes can feign gallop on the gasping Rocinante
till the ground gives way.
