Friday, 19 April 2019

DHANUSH – THE VERSATILE REINCARNATION


Bofors – End of a Glorious Innings?

Existence of Bofors in contemporary Indian military history is much like that of Karna in Mahabharata. While both irrefutably strengthened the side they were on, the ones who brought them forth were conspicuous through disassociation. The controversy that trailed the gun and doesn’t seem to abate even after decades of its existence and eventual extinction, resulted in two significant events. Firstly, the manufacturer of the howitzer was blacklisted, prohibiting Army from sourcing spares from it. Second, the priceless Transfer of Technology (TOT) accompanying the deal was left to languish denying India an opportunity to indigenously produce the state-of-the-art gun system.







It is the unbelievable robustness of the weapon and ingenuity of Indian Soldiers, that helped it continue booming in the wind-swept icy heights of Kargil, despite a chocked supply chain. Numerous instances of sublime individual valour apart, it is Bofors that tilted the Kargil War in India’s favour. Merits of the gun notwithstanding, Bofors will remain a political hot potato for times to come.

Dhanush – The Redeemer?

Heavy outflow of precious foreign exchange has often been attributed to Army's penchant for importing weapon systems. Justifying its stand, Army points out, quality inadequacies associated with Indian-made weapon systems. Approved induction of ‘Dhanush’ into the Indian Arsenal seems to change all that for now and open a new chapter for Indian Military Hardware Manufacturing Sector. Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) now leads the ‘Make in India’ story.

Force Multiplier

Dhanush, the contemporary Bofors reincarnate, retains the robust characteristics of its worthy predecessor. A combination of autonomous deployment capability, seamless day and night operability, longer range, better accuracy and varied payload deliverables, makes it more versatile and deadlier than Bofors. Dhanush is truly a, tactical battle field, force multiplier. Dhanush not only provides considerable battle field superiority and operational flexibility, it ensures strategic advantage integral to indigenous manufacturing capability of Military hardware.

Dhanush is equipped with ‘Artillery Gun Aiming and Positioning System’ (AGAPS), consisting of an inertial navigation system and encoders for positioning capability, muscle velocity reader for warhead departure feedback and firing data corrections, an on-board ballistic computer and communication equipment enabling advanced target acquisition and accurate fire support. It comes with upgraded hydraulic actuators and advanced day and night direct firing systems.  It retains the versatile self-propulsion unit, helping it to negotiate and deploy itself in mountainous areas with ease.

Capability

India has the wherewithal to produce world-class military hardware. OFB, through Project Dhanush, has proven that. Post extensive, rigorous multi-terrain, all-weather field trials, Dhanush has been accepted by Army. Consequently, Army is believed to have issued ‘Bulk Production Clearance’ and an order of 144 guns.  While OFB must be complemented for scripting the first credible, spectacular and mega ‘Make-in-India’ story, it must, safeguard itself against concerns, often voiced against it.

Concerns

Consistency is the hallmark of reliability and complacency its nemesis. Euphoria over the multi-million order book notwithstanding, given its past, OFB should prevent complacency creeping in. With a history of being afflicted with inconsistent quality and persistent timeline slippages, quality records of OFB may not be pleasing.

Army’s decision to phase out INSAS weapons is believed to have originated from quality concerns. OFB made anti-tank mines, declared defective and held far too long in a premier ammunition installation, awaiting disposal orders is believed to have caused a major fire resulting in tragic loss of lives. Front-line Armoured Fighting Vehicles and Infantry Combat Vehicles manufactured by OFB had their own share of quality problems.

Enjoying monopoly over most Indian Military Hardware, delivery against orders by Army on OFB is besieged by delay. OFB, being a Governmental organisation, remains insulated from pecuniary liabilities, that would have been automatically levied on defaulters. With ‘cold-start’ doctrine and ‘two-front’ engagements gaining traction, slippages in delivery has a direct impact on the war readiness of the country.

Caution

Howitzers, that reach well beyond the tactical battle field with a range of warheads, become the fulcrum elements in offensive and defensive land operations. Required to operate in extreme climatic conditions, these need to be backed by high quality metallurgy, hydraulics, ballistic and munitions. OFB must realise, that with each deployed howitzer, the moral weight of operation rests, as much on its shoulders, as on that of the individuals planning and executing the operation. Bofors had proved its mettle in real battle. 

This is the hour of reckoning for OFB and it must seize the opportunity with all its might.


18 comments:

  1. The article addresses more on the potential of ofb moreso with its maiden victory, of one may so call it, in producing Dhanush. The author has cleverly added a remark on caution when it comes to dealing with'such' an organisation!
    Perhaps the experience gained from the inadequacies in the past should engage more focus and a part 2/sequel of this article should be undertaken by the prolific author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Muscle for muzzle and accurate to a pin point.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sir.
    I really appreciate this clearly written and thought provoking article. A remarkable and extremely well-written article. Seldom have I seen the
    subject treated with such aplomb and genuine facts Sir. Sir, your article expresses both the positive and negative aspects of this important topic, without taking an emotional stance on either side of the issue.
    I look forward to reading your next informative work Sir.
    Thank You

    ReplyDelete
  4. An extremely well written and thought provoking article on a notable Make in India project Dhanush. OFB has great potential but it has remained largely under utilised due to Bureaucratic Stranglehold by the ministry officials. Structural changes and autonomy in functioning will enable OFB to produce much better results and meet requirements of the Armed Forces in given contractual timelines.
    The author may consider writing on these aspects in subsequent articles.

    Your articles are worth reading Sir.
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No doubt about the efficacy of Bofors and the cloud of suspicion on its procurement well brought out by the author. As regards the efficacy of OFBs, they need to change their work culture and if they can do that they can match the corporate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well written article by the General.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sir,a really good read. A balanced analysis of all sides and insightful too. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very informative article . Is it possible to be manufactured by pvt players should the O F B fail to meet the demands?

    ReplyDelete
  9. As suggested
    1. i am contemplating a sequel but looking at the problems faced by OFB in discharging its role effectively.
    2. The query "Is it possible to be manufactured by pvt players should the O F B fail to meet the demands?" opens up a whole new world of opportunities. if pursued vigorously and devoid of petty politicking it could lead India to be the most prolific producer of Military hardware.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kamal,

    the comment "The efficiency of the ordnance factory to maintain the equipment needs to be seen." i understand stems from unhappy experiences.

    But, we must remember that OFB too works under tremendous compulsions.

    The fact that OFB is not accountable to Army and seems detached and insensitive to army's requirement not withstanding, one cant ignore the fact Army too has not been kind in many ways to OFB.
    Remarkably unassailable and ever changing QRs and nonviable order quantities and impossible time lines have been order characteristics.

    However, it is observed that the ordnance factory had almost stopped supplying maintenance spares for its previous production to promote the sale and introduction of this equipment?
    but is it not the norm across the world to sop production of the phased out equipment and dry out spares. Is the inventory sufficient to meet spare needs over the next five years? are we leaving out cannibalization for up keep as a viable option?

    This is what i referred to as impractical approach of the Army.
    Look at the hardware inventory held.

    The inability to let go of the dead and obstinate act of holding on to obsolete inventory has led to a situation that can easily be termed as logisticans' nightmare. I would give OFB full marks for squeezing the Army out of comfort zone among the dead inventory

    April 19, 2019 at 4:35 AM

    ReplyDelete
  11. Authentic, balanced, dispassionate. Great that OFB has delivered a winner that could spur more such initiatives. Larger concern is whether production will ever be preferred over procurement? Will end users have greater say in make or buy decisions?

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Larger concern is whether production will ever be preferred over procurement? Will end users have greater say in make or buy decisions?"
    Two pertinent questions. Answers to these would decide future of Indian manufacturing sector especially in the field of military hardware

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Larger concern is whether production will ever be preferred over procurement? Will end users have greater say in make or buy decisions?"
    Two pertinent questions. Answers to these would decide future of Indian manufacturing sector especially in the field of military hardware

    ReplyDelete

  14. A well written article which succinctly brings out the need for laying down a comprehensive and well thought out policy for induction of rapid action arty in the Army/ Armed Forces. Bofors , by itself ,a well received weapon in the earlier years has been mired down by controversies relating to reports of quality which have perhaps stemmed from the fact of the kickbacks attributed to its purchase in India.

    The newly inducted Dhanush , which was designed by the OFB and officially inducted into the Indian Army on 8 th April 2019 , goes a step beyond the Bofors capabilities as I know it. Rapid action howitzers are essential in land warfare, and I had the privilege of seeing the Army Artillery in action during my attachment with the Army for land warfare as part of our Naval Long Gunnery course in Devlali and also in Mhow. Impressive fire power indeed ! Of course as rightly brought out by Gen. Jacob, the issue of Maintenance, supply of spares, etc continues to be a perennial issue of concern for the Armed Forces.

    Kudos to Gen. Jacob for elucidating the nuances of the new weapon development and its historical perspective !

    Cdr Victor Joseph, Navy Retd.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Technology doesn't come cheap and it doesn't come over night. Moreover the burden on the exchequer will determine the trade off between procurement and indigenous production ..if the OFB is able to deliver the goods ensuring Quality of the finished product, it shall anyday remain a far better alternative to procurement from foreign vendors.
    Too early to comment but lots of scope for contemplation. Notwithstanding, certainly an excellent start. Let's hope the quality matches up to the expectations of the user when mass production catches up.
    An excellent write up my dear Chacko Sir.
    Shall look forward to many more.
    Best wishes.
    Regards

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anurag
    Thanks for the input.
    we have made a beginning. A good one . its up to OFB to persevere and ensure that it doesn't let glories fade

    ReplyDelete
  17. Very well written article sir, you have to go for a sequel to get an insight into what went into its design, development, trials and production.GCF had got the order way back..... How much of it is actually indigenous may also be a point of research. As regards the performance of ofb, you know it better, whether it is by default or design(to prefer import) is a million dollar question. Compliments for this article sir.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Are my apprehensions finding physical forms?

    Concerned about the news of Army raising serious questions on quality issues with respect to ammunition supplied by OFB.

    Its time OFB get itself committed to quality

    ReplyDelete

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT