Ferocity, in battles on the
land and duels in the air, was the hallmark of the second Indo-Pakistan war of
1965. Many books have been written, on both sides of the border, about the war
and its battles, both in the air and on the land. Carefully researched facts,
figures, and diagrams outlining the progress of operations lend an essence of
authority to the work. Each story, replete with grit and valour, with all the
attendant ghastly details finely woven in, makes compelling narratives that
deify domestic military heroes and demonise the adversary. Straying from the
truth while writing about battles is an honourable compulsion, soaked in
nationalism. After all, war has never been about absolute truth, and history,
the narrative of the victor.
But what happens when both
parties declare themselves victors? Deja Vu?
This article, like the
previous three on India’s unparalleled wars, will not take us through
individual battles. We will navigate mostly through the causes to understand
what happened, briefly touching upon the war, in search of unparalleled
aspects. The war is said to have begun on 6 September 1965 when India launched
a full-scale counterattack across the international border and headed towards
Lahore. It ended in a Soviet brokered ceasefire declared on 22 September 1965.
Ironically, both countries declared themselves the winners in the war. Sensing
parallels and the unparalleled?
The term “counterattack”
clearly indicates that there was an attack by Pakistan on India, to which India
responded. Why would Pakistan attack India in 1965, out of the blue? The
obvious answer that everybody can easily peddle is that the unfinished Kashmir
business had to be completed. After all, the previous war, fought in 1947, was
about Kashmir. The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47 of 21
April 1948 had brought the first war to a ceasefire operative on 1 January
1949. Resolution 47 was only an expansion of Resolution 39, adopted on 20
January 1948. Resolution 39, the second on the Kashmir dispute, was to
investigate the issue, bring out the facts and recommend ways to settle the
differences between the two parties. Resolution 47 now mandated the three-step
process of ceasefire, withdrawal of troops and plebiscite. Both parties were to
withdraw all their military forces from the area. Claims and counterclaims
aside, demilitarisation never happened. The first step was never taken. There
were 12 resolutions on Kashmir before the war, mostly on issues brought up by
Pakistan. All these resolutions either set conditions for the process to move
forward or reaffirmed what had already been said. Interestingly, the last
resolution on Kashmir before the 1965 was Resolution 209, adopted on 4
September 1965 was passed after the Pakistani Troops had crossed into the Rann
of Kutch.
Was the 1965 war, therefore,
the result of Pakistan’s frustration with 16 years of waiting?
Well, let us explore a little
more before we form an opinion.
On 28 September 1965, Zulfikar
Ali Bhutto, in his speech in the United Nations General Assembly, complained
that Pakistan had repeatedly approached the Security Council since 1948 for a
solution and that it had exhausted peaceful diplomatic means. That speech
certainly said nothing about their efforts to demilitarise the area. Delivered
after the war, it was more of a justification of the misadventure. Only the
gullible would fall for this explanation. If military action was the way out,
it could have happened just after 1962. India was at its weakest militarily and
economically. If Pakistan had launched an attack simultaneously with the China war,
it would have had a major impact on India. Politically, India was also weak at
that time.
War is the military implementation
of a political decision. Wars do not originate out of nothing. It commences
when one country feels that either the conditions of the adversary are
conducive or favourable enough to launch an offensive, or when domestic
conditions warrant a move against the adversary. When the military leader is himself the
political head, the distance between decision and execution diminishes. Waging
war then becomes the first and easiest option. While the conditions within
India would have been favourable for Pakistan to launch an attack then, it did
not happen. Certainly, something else would have been the reason.
Let us look for it.
The post-independence march of
the country with Mohammad Ali Jinnah as its first Governor General ceased in
1948 with his death. Said to have been diagnosed with tuberculosis in 1930, he
developed lung cancer and died on 11 September 1948, barely a year after
Pakistan had won independence. Pakistan plunged into a very turbulent period of
power transfer. Khawaja Nazimuddin became the second Governor General of
Pakistan, and Mr Liaquat Ali Khan, already the prime minister, with Mohammed
Ali Jinnah, continued in office. On 17 January 1951, Mr Liaquat Ali Khan made
Mohammad Ayub Khan a general and the first commander-in-chief of the Pakistan
army, replacing General Sir Douglas Gracy. Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated on
16 October 1951.
The assassin, Saad Akbar
Babrak, an Afghan National, was shot dead immediately, and the reasons for the
assassination, undiscovered or undisclosed, were buried with him. Incidentally,
Liaquat Ali Khan had survived an attempted coup in March 1951. Khwaja
Nazimuddin, the Governor General of Pakistan, became the Prime Minister. Gulam
Mohammed, the finance minister, was appointed as the Governor General. On 23
March 1956, Pakistan became an Islamic Republic, and the office of the Governor
General was replaced with that of the President. Major General Iskander Mirza
(retd) became the first President of Pakistan. Meanwhile, governance had
deteriorated, and the common man had started feeling the impact. The divide
between various regions of the country aggravated, leading to political
instability.
Meanwhile, Pakistan exploited
the Cold War conditions to beef up its military hardware. On 19 May 1954, it
signed the Mutual Defence Assistance Agreement (MDAA) with the USA in Karachi.
The USA, in pursuit of the Truman Doctrine to contain communism, found the
geographical proximity of Pakistan suited to its plans against the Soviet Union
and China. India was not willing to play second fiddle to the US in their Cold
War efforts. MDAA fetched Pakistan tanks, fighter planes, transport planes,
radar systems and naval ships. Pakistani military officers went to the US for
training.
Pakistan received more than $900 million worth of military equipment, effectively bridging the military hardware disparity it faced after partition. Interestingly, all this military hardware, according to the agreement, was to be used exclusively for internal security, legitimate self-defence or participation in the United Nations’ duties. (Rings a familiar bell? The USA did that again later. Starting January 1983, Peace Gate 1 Program delivered 28 F-16 A, 12 F-16 B, besides other military hardware to Pakistan, all for counter terrorist and counterinsurgency operations. In February 2025, the Trump administration released $ 300 out of the $ 450 million funds sanctioned by the Biden Administration in September 2022.)
On 7 October 1958, the
President of Pakistan abrogated the constitution, dismissed the central and
provincial governments, declared martial law and appointed General Mohammed
Ayub Khan, then the army commander-in-chief, as the Chief Martial Law Administrator.
On 27 October 1958, hardly a fortnight later, Ayub Khan removed Mirza, in a
bloodless coup, exiled him to London and became President himself. He also
retired from the army that day! Since the public was already dissatisfied with
how the country was run, the coup seems to have been welcomed. President Ayub
Khan introduced many land reforms and strengthened the relationship with the
United States.
On 27 October 1959, Ayub
Khan’s presidential government declared him a Field Marshal. On that same day,
the government also introduced a system called “Basic Democracy”. The country
was divided into 80,000 “Basic Democratic” units, and each such unit was to
elect one representative called the “Basic Democrat.” Pakistan now had 80,000
local representatives to ensure grassroots governance. In 1962, through the
newly promulgated constitution that advocated a presidential system, Ayub Khan
consolidated power in his hands. Despite curbs on political freedom, Pakistan
under Field Marshal Ayub Khan achieved significant economic growth. The
benefits of the modernisation and industrial growth seemed to favour West
Pakistan. East Pakistan felt politically and economically marginalised, and the
divide between the two became glaring.
On 13 October 1962, one week
before China attacked India, Pakistan commenced negotiations with China over
disputed territories. The talks culminated in Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Chen Yi,
the two foreign ministers, signing the Sino-Pakistan boundary agreement on 2
March 1963. China ceded about 750 square miles while Pakistan gave away more
than 2,050 square miles, mostly in the Gilgit-Baltistan area that India claimed
ownership. China also gave $60 million interest-free loan to support Pakistan’s
economy and strengthen military cooperation.
On 2 January 1965, Pakistan
went in for a presidential election. The electoral college of 80,000 Basic
Democrats voted. The public had nothing to do with the election. The main
contestants were Mohammad Ayub Khan and Fatima Jinnah, the sister of the founder
of Pakistan, backed by a coalition of all the opposition parties. Ayub Khan is
said to have polled 49,951 votes. Fatima Jinnah, who contested as the mother of
the nation, gathered only 28,691 votes. The other two contestants, both
independents, Mahmud Ali Kasuri, polled 2,847, and Ghulam Muhammad Sadiq got
1,106. The total number of votes polled exceeded the official electoral
college by 2,595. Naturally, there were complaints of vote manipulation in
favour of the sitting president. This led to widespread agitation alleging
rampant vote rigging. The urban areas of West Pakistan and most areas of East
Pakistan (Now Bangladesh) saw protests. The public turned against the ruler,
and Ayub Khan's legitimacy as the President took a severe blow. Something was
required to quell the rising discontentment and opposition and redeem the trust
of the public in the presidency. Uniting the country against an existential
threat was the best way forward.
Would Kashmir be the objective?
We will find out in the next part.
(NOTE: Picture GROK generated)
1. If you decide to comment, it will be nice if you give your name too. Just write your name after the comment.
2. Please DO NOT FORGET TO FOLLOW.
3. Read in your language?
Click on the translate button and choose your language .
(To be continued…)
Thoroughly enjoyed this thought-provoking take on the 1965 war — refreshingly free from the usual drumbeats of battlefield glory. The political undercurrents, strategic timing, and sharper look at Pakistan’s posturing make for a compelling read. But just when I was fully immersed, you left us dangling like an unfinished ceasefire — craving the next chapter! Please don’t stop the convoy mid-road; we’re all waiting for the rest of the journey.
ReplyDeleteA totally new dimension to the conflict is being unwrapped. Very interesting and logical write up Sir
ReplyDeleteA well researched write up putting facts in the correct perspective.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, unbiased, Well put together and understandable. Great work Jacob! I have been enlightened on many aspects to say the least.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, unbiased, Well put together and understandable. Great work Jacob! I have been enlightened on many aspects to say the least. Also forced me to do some research of my own. Not too much though.
ReplyDeleteI have reposted this comment since it was not meant to be anonymous.
Great. Waiting for Sequel
ReplyDeleteInteresting read JT. Some aspects were unknown earlier. I can see some parallels with current situation ( personal opinion) Will await the next installment.
ReplyDeleteThis well-researched article on the 1965 Indo-Pak war goes beyond battlefield heroic tales. The author has logically explained the political turmoil in Pakistan, which made the timing of the war clear. The article shows the war wasn’t a sudden eruption but a calculated move to mask the domestic troubles brewing in Pakistan at that time.
ReplyDeleteInformative, engaging and worth reading more than once.
The immediate trigger for the operation was Pakistan’s infiltration under Operation Gibraltar, but the war’s roots lay in unresolved Kashmir tensions since 1947.
ReplyDeleteWhat was meant to be a covert, deniable operation became the trigger for a conventional war.The ultimate aim was to weaken Indian control without crossing the international border (so it could be framed as an internal uprising).It failed as locals in Kashmir did not rise up in mass rebellion; many reported the infiltrators to Indian forces.
Jagajeeve, Pala
Great work sir. Gives out better perspective of circumstances. Eagerly looking forward for the future posts
ReplyDelete