DO NOT CROSS THE LINE

 

A few days back, I was driving home from the neighbouring city. Seeing the painstakingly laid and beautifully crafted white line continuously snaking along like an endless work of art on the road, I asked my wife, “Saw that line?” We were negotiating a blind curve on the road. Both sides of the road had white lines clearly showing the edges. The broad line with reflectors in the middle of the road was meant to separate the traffic, and drivers are expected to keep their vehicles within their side of the line. Roads in this part of the country have many curves and gradients. They are well-marked and take on a high density of traffic. Almost all trucks on Indian roads have their rears marked with “Blow Horn” along with other funny and sometimes philosophical quotes. Unlike in the West, where honking is considered uncivil, here, signage asking drivers to ‘blow horn’ can be found along the road, across the country. 

Before my wife could answer, a car, without any warning, overtook us from the right, entering the lane meant for traffic from the opposite side. All of a sudden, a truck appeared from the opposite lane. The car swung wildly left, got in front of us, got through the space that I involuntarily made by braking hard, and sped away as if nothing had happened. The white line was meant to reduce such surprises and prevent accidents on the road, guiding law-abiding citizens to their intended destinations safely. 


For whom do these lines snake all the way?

Most people couldn’t care less. Oblivious to the presence of the lines on the road, either out of ignorance or on purpose, they violate its sanctity with impunity. In a society afflicted by an unprecedented epidemic called fearlessness of the law, those who voluntarily adhere to their lines and lanes are part of a species fast going extinct. The make and size of the vehicle, the importance one assumes for oneself, and the assured immunity from consequences add to the recklessness of the driver. Such people chart their own rules and routes. Everybody else on the road is nothing but a minion, an infringement on the road space that they consider their sovereign right. They expect others to scurry out of the road before they become menacing. If you happen to be driving up against a person who has crossed over to the oncoming traffic because it is his right of might and considers the line non-existent, you have the option of surrendering your space on the road, squeezing your vehicle and yourself. If your response is not good enough, do not expect kindness and civility from such an uncouth mighty. The two-wheelers are no less mighty. They are the acrobats of the road and add another dimension to the ordeal. Atop the mean machines that refuse to stay controlled in unsteady hands are angry, impatient, and adrenaline-driven people, some of them on induced euphoria. 

Most of those who flout rules assume immunity because they are influential, hold clout through political and social connections, or have money to spare. They all come together to make driving a challenge for those unlike them. If everybody involved in road incidents is documented, they could either themselves become statistical data for fatal and non-fatal road accidents or make others count. Essentially, these are all clear-cut violations of the law. When people generally break the law, assured of no adverse consequences, it means that law enforcement has become weak, blind and disproportionate. When socio-economic status and political clout or other influences can dictate truth, it means that the society, devoid of conscience, is plunging headlong into lawlessness. Road traffic is one of the most telltale signs of how civilised an area or society is.  

Like the safety lines on the roads, there is a set of safety lines we draw subconsciously to live with consciously.

These are lines that we draw when we interact with others. We draw these invisible yet powerful lines around us, different for each individual we interact with, to keep them at the distance we want them to be. It shapes our safety zones, dictates the proximity we allow others, and defines the ‘thus-far and no further’ limits of ‘myspace’ boundaries. In fact, it dictates almost everything about interpersonal relationships. We draw these lines through our words, deeds, and gestures. These invisible lines are so powerful that they influence even our body language and responses. Those who intrude make us uncomfortable. Infringement of our imaginary lines could eventually precipitate discord. Such infringement could be deliberate or incidental. 

When people cross our lines, oblivious to their presence, they are taking us for granted. Some of them assume that they have the liberty to do so. In such cases, it is important that we immediately make it known that they have crossed the line. Failure to correct the infringement immediately could normalise such trespasses. The onus of such correction rests with us. Some people cross our lines deliberately. It may seem just uncivil in the beginning, but that is mostly a character flaw. They may not always come across as violent or abusive people. Some of them sweet-talk their intrusive coercion. Either way, it is intimidation. They are dangerous and should be avoided. Personal relationships, where people blatantly infringe or disrespect the sanctity of these lines, are bound to turn toxic and suffocating, sooner or later.

Life could be beautifully different if only people did not ‘cross the line’. But nothing in life is ideal.  We would easily know when others cross our lines. The problem is how to let the other person know that the line has been trespassed. 

What do you suggest?

Please post your response in the comment section. 

 

 

 

Comments

  1. You have touched on an extremely relevant and important issue. Analogy of the lines on road and our relationship brings clarity on it . In both the evolving social fabric
    needs analysis. Crossing of lines in both are toxic and at times fatal (not necessarily physical). The answers lie in your maturity to respond to such transgressions
    Interesting read as always look fwd to more

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sir, the correlation between the lines on road and in relationshios could not have been brought out better. The relevance and understanding of the clear boundaries in life is very important for a healthy relationship.
    Appreciate your style of writing.

    Aswal

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent post, and these days, not crossing that line needs enormous self restraint and respect for the overall societal norms, be in personal life or professional life. It seems to be becoming an exception that a norm unfortunately!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely Sir, the relevance to understanding clear boundaries is often understated.
    Appreciate your style of writing.

    Regards

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well written General. But after 60 we have to give more space for the new Gen. Otherwise we may have to suffer.Lines are not fixed. It has to move sideways according to the person on the other side

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that we are above 60. But to accept that morals have shifted to the level that crossing no-go lines pains.

      Delete
  6. Dear Sir,

    Whether it is traffic sense or respect for fellow citizens. Similarly, there’s no civic sense and morality. With every passing day we see more of chaos and utter disregard to law and order. Breaking rules and disrespecting others is the norm. Confronting such hooliganism is almost impossible. Though I did confront many times but finally gave up. Mobocracy and lawlessness have become normal. Crossing lines in all types relationships has become all too common. Thank you for blogs. Most of us can instantly connect with the themes. But, alas not many of us can do something worthwhile to correct them. Views are personal . Yet, hope for the better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What you have highlighted is the truth, as stark as it stares. We live in times when hooliganism has a halo around it, and hooligans are hailed. Yet truth, however inconvenient, is truth. We can continue to be good. Let me share something. i acknowledge good behaviour on the road by waving at them. surprisingly i see people responding. Goodness has not died. so let us hope ...

      Delete
  7. Good evening sir.
    Laws are made for the people, and not people are made for the law. But unfortunately in reality one should say 'laws are made for SOME people '. Even though laws exist, it ignores a part of the society, a part carved out by themselves for their own convenience, that is it. Law enforcing agencies directly or indirectly are forced to show a blind eye towards the matter. Nothing will change it. You and I are encouraged to be mere silent witnesses to such behaviour , which may allow us to complete the godgiven span of the precious life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we can continue to adhere and abide by law. How about invasion of our personal space?

      Delete
  8. It is all about the strength of a society and the country that the people follow the social and legal rules and do not ross the lines.

    People from the weak countries, when they move to the countries where laws are followed, they too become law abiding and do not cross the line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Conforming to civic norms voluntarily is a sign of strength. And there is no point in having lines drawn when it cant be enforced.

      Delete
  9. Sir, we'll thought blog on daily routine issue. The irony is you can see in recent time law enforcing agencies like police involved themselves in crime. U can see police vehicle moving in wrong lane and violating red light encourages young generations. Parents of students studying in a
    reputed schools daily violating (moving.in.one way, blocking traffic, waiting children to see off Tuill gate)while dropping children to the schools what good
    can they teach to young generation. The need of hour is hefty fine, ruthless law enforcing agency and educating younger generations. It may impact on lifestyle too maintain relationships in a longer go.











    certainly support to bye pass.




    crimes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Children see and learn. You may tell them anything but they copy what we do

      Delete
  10. Road violations have sadly become habitual, almost accepted as inevitable—though awareness and infrastructure are slowly improving. While such issues exist everywhere, stronger systems and accountability make a difference.

    Life is no different. “When in Rome, do as the Romans do” reminds us that adaptability is essential. We meet all kinds of people, not all by choice.

    Wisdom lies in knowing when to adjust, when to step back, and when to draw boundaries. The wise don’t argue with crossed lines—they quietly redraw their circle. Freedom begins with saying no without guilt and yes without fear.

    Jagajeeve, Pala

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Life is also a continuum of conflicts contradictions and compromises. it depends on us how and where we draw comfort from.

      Delete
  11. This is a thought provoking article. However, General, you have missed out to mention the expert driving skills of our auto-rikshaw drivers who think that if their front wheel can go into a gap, the rear wheels can also go through it and in the bargain they end up damaging other vehicles.

    Over taking on a single continuous line, parking in no parking zone, jumping the signals and driving on the wrong side of the roads are taken for granted in our Indian roads. There is also this unwritten rule in India that the fault always lies on the bigger of the two vehicles that meet with an accident.

    When I drive me car for 20 to 30 kms and return home without abusing someone or without getting by abused by someone, I feel my day is made. But that seldom happens.

    The transition from road discipline to personal boundaries is powerful and very relatable. Sadly, the fearlessness of the law you describe isn’t limited to roads—it shows up everywhere in our lives

    I suggest that whenever anyone crosses the line we have set, we should avoid contacts with that person and indirectly tell him that he has taken us for granted and we have not liked it. A sensible person will understand it but then the point is how many are sensible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much for the detailed comment. You are the only one who responded to the question i raised in the blog. Thank you very much.

      Delete

Post a Comment

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT

Popular posts from this blog

“Jo Bole, So Kunda Khole” – Reluctant Response Rationale?

BUILDING BRAND FOR BETTER RETURNS

Purpose of Life - Struggling to Define one?