CHILDREN, CHACHAN IS GIVING UP
“You need others’ help to
succeed, but not to fail. CHACHAN THOTTU, MAKKALE,” the old man
standing before us declared.
Mr Mathew, whom people fondly
called Chachan, was part of the group with whom I toured Vietnam and Cambodia.
In Malayalam, Chachan Thottu, Makkale, means, “Chachan is giving up,
dear children.” Some Malayalam expressions risk losing their warmth, character,
and actual feel when translated.
When the 78-year-old
introduced himself that way during the ice-breaking session on our bus journey
in Vietnam, his words struck me. I felt they came from something far deeper
than the obvious. The itinerary was packed, and we hardly had time for personal
conversations. But I could not wait to find out. What could have prompted him
to say that? Barely had I unpacked and settled down after returning to India
when I telephoned Mr Mathew.
Our conversation lasted about
15 minutes.
Mr Mathew was a surveyor by
profession and had been instrumental in settling disputes between landowners in
his native place. When neighbours are dependent solely on their land for a
living, disputes and quarrels are natural. Land disputes can turn violent,
especially when livelihoods are at stake. Mathew was known as an unbiased
surveyor, and the police often called him to settle disputes. Mediation is not
easy, especially when each party involved believed that its perception of the
situation was the only truth. Many times, one or both parties accused him of
being partisan and would resort to violence. He had been assaulted, abused and
even stabbed.
Chachan is a farmer by
instinct and calling. His book, “Plan Cheyyu, Plant Chayyu” (Plan and
plant) in Malayalam, is about his experience with land and what it can yield.
He now owns a large farm. When the farm ran into difficulties, he diversified
and started a homestay project. He even gifted a few of us, winners of
impromptu competitions during the tour, a stay in his cottages for free.
How I wished I was one of
them!
Chachan had seen poverty,
experienced hardships, but today is comfortably well off and travels often. His
wife, on the other hand, prefers to stay home, spending her time praying and
tending to the farm.
“With all this success, why such
a negative thought?” I asked.
“Differences in perception and
opinion are at the heart of many interpersonal conflicts,” Chachan said.
“Without realising it, and certainly not deliberately, our egos begin to
dictate our positions in any situation. Perhaps that is simply how we human
beings are naturally. We see situations only from our own perspective and begin
to believe that what we see is the truth — and therefore, we are right. The
long-term impact on our lives becomes secondary to the need for an immediate
victory. Small daily victories make us believe that we are on a winning streak.
One thing leads to another until it becomes our nature, and we hardly realise
how far we have gone. Often, turning back is no longer easy. Being right
becomes less important than being seen the winner.”
I could not help but
agree.
“In matters of dispute, there
are always spectators. They may or may not be visible,” Chachan said.
“Unwittingly, people are performing for those they think are watching. The
shouting, abusing, theatrics, or even violence are tools to impress others.
They believe that this is how their position can be established. Yet, in many
cases, their position may have little to do with what is right or true. That is
when a strange thing happens. The issue itself becomes secondary. What matters
is not whether the claim is right, but whether one can emerge looking
victorious. For them, winning becomes proof that their perception was right.”
“Sometimes, the wisest thing a
person can do is walk away,” Chachan said.
“The decision to give up,
knowing fully well that the other person is being difficult, illogical or
irrational, may seem to be a defeat or loss to the spectators. Such an attitude
could invite losses. Yet in the long run, it pays.”
As we said bye and I put my
phone down, it dawned on me that what Chachan had said was not about giving up
in defeat. It was a mantra for success. Success often requires people to help
us. Failure, however, needs no assistance. Ego, anger, stubbornness and the
desperate need to win are quite sufficient.
Note: The picture is of a stele in the Temple of Literature, Hanoi



Beautiful writeup. Giving up is not always a sign of failure or weakness. Especially in disputes as you have stated.
ReplyDelete